In the context of sentencing, what is usually considered by the judge?

Judges typically consider mandatory sentencing guidelines when determining a sentence for a convicted individual. These guidelines are established laws that provide a framework for sentencing, helping ensure consistency and fairness in the justice system. They outline minimum and maximum penalties for various offenses, taking into account factors such as the severity of the crime and the defendant's criminal history.

Mandatory sentencing helps to limit the discretion of judges, which can lead to more uniform sentences across similar cases. This can prevent disparities that might arise from personal bias or differing judicial philosophies. While other factors, such as public opinion or the defendant's background, may come into play during sentencing, the adherence to mandatory guidelines provides a structured approach that judges must typically follow.