The Mollen Commission is an example of what type of effort to control police corruption?

The Mollen Commission serves as a prominent example of an outside review effort specifically aimed at addressing and controlling police corruption. Established in the early 1990s in New York City, its primary function was to investigate alleged corruption within the police department. The commission was independent and operated separate from the police force, allowing for a more objective perspective on corruption issues, as it was not influenced by the very department it was reviewing.

Utilizing an outside commission helps ensure that investigations are unbiased, as external entities can approach situations from a fresh viewpoint without the potential conflicts of interest that internal boards might face. This can lead to a higher level of accountability and transparency within law enforcement agencies, ultimately contributing to reforms and measures designed to prevent corruption.

The other options—civil litigation, citizen review boards, and internal review boards—represent different mechanisms that can be utilized to address issues within law enforcement. However, they do not encapsulate the specific framework and independence that the Mollen Commission exemplified in its role as an external entity focusing on corruption scandals.