What is one criticism of the "three strikes law"?

The criticism that the "three strikes law" can lead to disproportionately long sentences for minor offenses is based on the premise that the law mandates severe penalties after three felony convictions, regardless of the nature or severity of the third offense. This means that an individual could receive a harsh sentence, such as life imprisonment, for a relatively minor crime if they have previously been convicted of two felonies. This aspect raises concerns about fairness and proportionality in the criminal justice system, highlighting how mandatory sentencing laws can result in unjust outcomes and contribute to prison overcrowding, particularly affecting marginalized communities. This criticism underscores the law's potential to produce inequitable results, where individuals are punished severely for non-violent or minor felonies due to their past convictions.