Which of the following is *not* a factor that distinguishes private policing from public policing?

The concept that distinguishes private policing from public policing primarily revolves around the motivations, resources, and methods employed in their respective operations. In this context, the aspect of reactive patrol relates more closely to criteria characterizing public policing rather than private policing.

Public policing is often reactive in nature, responding to incidents and crimes after they occur, whereas private policing can be more proactive, focusing on prevention and deterrence. This focus may come from a desire to reduce loss or liability within privately owned properties or businesses.

Additionally, factors such as neighborhood disorder creating fear, the ability of neighborhoods to emit crime-promoting signals, and the requirement for citizen cooperation are more applicable across both private and public contexts but highlight different operational challenges and engagement strategies rather than operational techniques. Therefore, the necessity of reactive patrol in the realm of policing does not serve as a distinguishing factor between private and public policing, making it the correct choice for what does not differentiate the two.